Ordinarily I delve into Nickelodeon because I’m surfing on a lazy Sunday, and lacking substance in the form of Grim Adventures or a nice block of Mythbusters I find myself tossing about in the world of SpongeBob. (Ben 10 is tolerable, but only just barely, and I wonder how long it’ll take for Ben/Gwen hentai to hit the net, assuming it hasn’t already.*)
So this last weekend I stumbled across an almost Beatlesish song called “Crazy Car”, which I admit has a good hook and is nicely rendered, and learned it’s a preliminary to a new show on Nick that is debuting in late January, something they call The Naked Brothers Band.
Which would be cute, but the brothers in question are aged eleven and eight. The first two names that came to my mind were Michael Jackson and Mark Foley. (As in “NBB was directed by … and produced by…” respectively.) Naked Brothers Band … Is it really possible that no one at Nickelodeon thought, Hey, maybe we could call the show anything else at all?
A once-over of the Web page tells me not much, but I can infer a great deal; this is basically a warmed-over Partridge Family for tweens. It seems inane and insipid, but geared toward doing what parents want least to have happen: Giving moisties to their ten-year-old daughters.**
Look, I’m a liberal; I have been all my adult life, and I expect to be until I die. But that does not mean I like the idea of any for-profit, commercial network making money off of turning tween life into some bizarre, quasi-valid pursuit of boyfriends, dating or making out. No kid at ten needs to be talking about his or her relationship. Until the kid gives up Legos or Barbie, sex is too soon.***
Even the term “tween” was invented by marketing dimwits, many of them possibly the ones behind the selling of “NBB”. 2007 is going to be a year of intense and deeply-wrought chaos for parents of kids aged nine to twelve. And a lot of it is likely to be because of this “NBB” thing, I suspect.
Several years ago I wrote a book called The Beasts of Delphos. It’s a coming-of-age novel that starts when its protagonist, Barris, as about twelve years of age, and it follows his exploits into his late teens. In that novel, I describe — obliquely, and in depth, but not pornographic depth — Barris’s life, including his sex life. He has a male lover, and is deeply involved in intimacy with several women as well; and yet, I’m disturbed by the NBB idea.
Not because it relaxes sexual mores; and not because it may or may not change how we see tweens — though, given the general discomfort in the US about how interested preteens seem to be in adult behavior, this should be a little disturbing to at least some parents. It’s because of the intent of one versus that of the other. Beasts of Delphos was written by an adult, for adults; it was and is not intended to be consumed by children. NBB, on the other hand, is all about being by, for and targeted at kids who don’t even have hair enough to know what sex actually is.
Problem?
If an extreme liberal like me is lifting a warning flag, well yeah, maybe.
Parents, here’s my advice to you: Channel-block Nickelodeon and buy a Wii, right now. You’ll be vastly, profoundly glad you did in less than eighteen months when you compare notes with people who didn’t heed this warning.
And buy condoms, just in case. (They might even have the NBB logo on them. I bet they glow and are covered in polka dots.) Not for your own kids; they’re to give to the parents who didn’t read this note, when they ask if their kids can have a NBB Slumber Party at your house.
No, no — I’m not seriously suggesting that this vapid kids’ cable thing is going to destroy your ethical hold on your children. But even the liberal I am, even after reviewing the Nick site that seems to be at great pains to emphasize the “strong moral center” of the show, I’ve been watching the material that Nick is cranking out to promote their new series — and I, liberal, atheist, marginal hedonist — I am made a little uneasy by it.
That should worry the hell out of almost anyone.
====
* Didn’t Google, don’t want to know, so don’t post links.
** And, to be sure, stimulating the occasional ten-year-old boy.
*** And even then, it’s probably too soon; it’s up to the parents to help their children decide, not some cell-phone-in-the-ear marketroid sales tard.
by DayTripper
12 Feb 2007 at 23:38
Yah, I’ll say one more thing to sum up my onion:
Nick being a program for kids; where kids could be kids, has always been anti-KAGOY (n. a marketing concept based on the idea that children participate in pop culture or desire material goods intended for older consumers.)– AKA didn’t indulge in the concept of ‘tweens pushing adulthood.’
This new show is however contrary to there beliefs; but anyway if it’s on Nickelodeon parents automatically assume that it should be appropriate for kids, they shouldn’t have to think about blocking a program. At least that’s my opinion and I believe Warren put his two cents about this and probably said it better than I.
I PERSONALLY (as in my personal opinion) think the show sucks, its humor fails and lack substance and the acting is well… ‘Not all that good.’
I do however like the music, having a soft spot for the Beatles, which the music is a sort of reminiscent of and I’m impressed that the kids DO write and actually play their own instruments.
So I just wish the show was more about the music instead of the crappy plot concepts.
by DayTripper
12 Feb 2007 at 23:39
that is all…
by jordyn
13 Feb 2007 at 15:16
sorry but I just had to be reading this I’m 12 years old and Iwatch the show every Saturday.I don’t know what you guy were watching but the show has nothing to do with the s word at all!!! It just shows a kids lifee as a rockstar. And I happening to love Nat looked up EVERYTHING on him and the show.It’s about what I said but some is mixed with fiction some is make believe and it shows kids that they can fufill thier ddreams and anyone can be a real rockstar if they put thier mind to it. Yes, they do have him in there with a crush but she barely likes him and they only kiss each other on the CHEEK twice.
Yes I am angered by this (but only because I like him)
by Warren
13 Feb 2007 at 16:38
Overall, the tone of comments here has remained fairly respectful and I appreciate that; apart from about a half dozen one-liners talking about cuuuuuuute this and gr8 that, I haven’t had to use too much restraint.
However, this thread is played out. Nothing new is being posted; it’s mostly broadside-swapping along the lines of “Uh huh!” and “Nuh uh!” now.
So thanks for writing, everyone; I’m gonna lock out this post for further comments. I think 104 is enough.
Mike, I’ll be glad to see your NBB paper if you ever get around to writing it. Just look for an open thread sometime here or toss up a note and mention it in passing. (I’m keeping the email from being too obvious right now because I have no love of spam, but it is out there for those who have some decent sleuthing skills.)
Ally, I don’t think you made anyone miserable.
Stephen, I’m glad you decided I’m not a total asshat. Thanks. And FTR, I’m 39.
Danielle, we might well agree on many things — and disagree on others. Feel free to come back and check on me from time to time and, if I get out of line, flog me a litte. I need that.
DayTripper, keeping it measured and focused is never easy. You’ve straddled that line well.
Brittany, thanks for letting me soapbox a little.
Oh, and Jordyn: I was impressed by your tone; you admitted to having an extreme slant but still kept it civil, and you were able to post a reasoned response even though you felt, as you put it, enraged. That’s impressive, and a trait I think many could benefit from learning — not the least the people who are trying (and failing) to run the world you’re eventually going to be stuck with. Well done.
Thanks, all, and tune in from time to time to see what other wrongheaded or bad ideas I get. If you want to continue to tell me what a moron I am, how I don’t understand kids or would be a crappy dad, check out a more recent post I did on Pom-Pom Diva Barbie. Which, let’s face it, is a silly idea. (The doll, I mean.)
Pingback
by If I Had a Son… at The Indigestible
16 Feb 2007 at 22:14
[…] I bash kids’ shows regularly and frequently attack religiosity. It’s easy for me to do that, since I don’t have any kids of my own. I can sit on my butt and theorize, and I can talk endlessly about what I’d support or reject in my own kids, if I had any. I thrash McDonald’s, I smoke NBB, I deride and belittle fundamentalism. […]
Pingback
by Naked Brothers Band Having Sex With Their Preteen Lolita Phone Numbers Boys and Girls Naked Hentai! at The Indigestible
15 Jun 2007 at 19:59
[…] Just fucking with the inlink stats. Christ, I’m tired of getting hits from pervs looking for preteen porn just because I posted something on NBB n+now fucking months ago. […]